U.S. Intellectual History Blog

4 Thoughts on this Post

S-USIH Comment Policy

We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.

  1. Every attempt at discussion with Clare Spark I’ve ever seen (or attempted myself, much to my regret) has gone similarly: Every word means what she wants it to mean; every word denotes a category which is specific and neatly bounded; every thinker fits into her categories despite all the evidence to the contrary. You used the phrase “down the rabbit hole” in that discussion: the only apt description of engaging with her work. Though “through the looking glass” works pretty well if the issue of race comes up…..

  2. Does Professor Dresner have something to say to me that transcends a personal attack? I had thought that scholars who were comfortable with their own work did not have to resort to mud-slinging. Moreover, I cannot find a single instance where he has engaged me personally on any subject whatsoever.

  3. It’s been a while, Ms. Spark. Not everything on the internet persists.

    And I’m both perfectly comfortable with my own work, and stand by my description of your rhetorical engagement strategies, which was intended to put Dr. Hartman’s experience into context.

Comments are closed.