U.S. Intellectual History Blog

One Thought on this Post

S-USIH Comment Policy

We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.

  1. I’ve hesitated to comment on Peter Novick’s demise because my only contact with the man was a brief correspondence back in 1990 about That Noble Dream; but a man as thoughtful as Novick deserves a tribute, even if it comes from an unlikely source. In a short review, I had praised That Nobel Dream more as a serious meditation about the state of things in the late 80s than a theoretical contribution to historiography and Novick didn’t like that. I’m inclined to believe, however, that it is precisely the people who think about the here and now who produce the works of lasting worth.

Comments are closed.