Tag Archive


On the Relationship Between Our Analytic Vocabulary and Our Subjects’ Vocabulary

Having just gotten back from this year’s wonderful S-USIH conference, I’m thinking about the many terrific papers I heard and stimulating conversations I took part in, in and out of sessions.  I’m still feeling too close to the event to issue many general thoughts about the conference, the state of S-USIH today, and what I hope that the next year will bring, for the conference, Society, and of course, this blog….beyond simply noting that, while there’s certainly things we might be doing better (especially as regards involving more historians whose focus is on anything prior to 1945), I came away Read more